Caminhando com os fundamentos da gramática gerativa
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18364/rc.v1i47.33Résumé
RESUMO: Esse artigo tem como propósito revisar os fundamentos, hipóteses, objetivos e propostas de implementações computacionais da Gramática Gerativa, sob uma ótica interdisciplinar que inclui além da Linguística, a Epistemologia, a Neurociência da Linguagem, a Biologia e a Evolução das Espécies. O artigo defende que, não obstante as atualizações que a Gramática Gerativa assumiu em seus 60 anos de existência, há uma coerência profunda das suas ideias principais, o que torna as muitas alterações e versões hipóteses de trabalho legítimas para um mesmo corpo teórico. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Gramática Gerativa; computação sintática; fundamentos teóricos; Além da Adequação Explicativa; evolução das espécies.Téléchargements
Références
BERWICK, R. C.; FRIEDERICI, A. D.; CHOMSKY, N.; BOLHUIS, J. J. Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 17, n. 2, 2013, p. 89-98.
BERWICK, R. C.; OKANOYA, K.; BECKERS, G. J. L.; BOLHUIS, J. J. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 15, n. 3, 2011, p. 113-121.
BOLHUIS, J. J.; OKANOYA, K.; SCHARFF, C. Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, London: Macmillan, v. 11, 2010, p. 747-759.
CHOMSKY, N. Language and other cognitive systems. What is special about language? Language Learning and Development, London: Routledge, v. 7, p. 263-278, 2011.
______. Biolinguistics and the human capacity. In: ______. Language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 173-185. (Lecture at MTA, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest, May 17, 2004.)
______. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2005.
______. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 2001. 28 p. (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20)
______. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 230 p.
______. Derivation by phase. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 1999. 43 p. (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18)
______. Minimalist Inquiries: the framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 1998. (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15). Republished in MARTIN, R.; MICHAELS, D.; URIAGEREKA, J. (Eds.) Step by step: essays in syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. p. 89-115.
______. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995. 420 p.
______. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J. (Eds.) The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993. p. 1-52. (Current Studies in Linguistics, 24)
______. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1986. 314 p. (Convergence Series)
______. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1982. 121 p. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 6)
______. Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981. 371 p. (Studies in Generative Grammar, 9)
______. Aspects of the theory of syntax. 10.ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1965. 251 p.
______. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957. 117 p.
CHOMSKY, N.; LASNIK, H. The theory of principles and parameters. In: CHOMSKY, N The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995, p. 13-128.
CHOMSKY, N.; MILLER, G. A. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In: BUSH, R. R.; GALANTER, E.; LUCE, R. D. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, v. 2, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1962, p. 269-321.
CURTISS, S.; FROMKIN, V.; KRASHEN, S.; RIGLER, D.; RIGLER, M. The linguistic development of Genie. Language, Washington: Linguistic Society of America, v. 50, n. 3, 1974, p. 528-554.
DARWIN, C. The descent of man. London: Penguin, 2004. 864 p. (Penguin Classics) First published by London: John Murray, 1871.
FISHER, S. E; SCHARFF, C. FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends in Genetics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 25, n. 4, 2009, p. 166-77.
FISHER S. E; VARGHA-KHADEM, F.; WATKINS, K. E.; MONACO, A. P.; PEMBREY, M. E. Localization of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature Genetics, London: Macmillan, v. 18, n. 2, 1998, p. 168-70.
FITCH, W. T. The evolution of speech: a comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 4, n. 7, 2000, p. 258-267.
FITCH, W. T.; HAUSER, M. D.; CHOMSKY, N. The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 97, p. 179-210, 2005.
FRANÇA, A. I.; LAGE, A. C. Uma visão biolinguística da arbitrariedade saussuriana. Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, v. 48, n. 3, 2013, p. 299-308.
GOPNIK, M. Feature-blind grammar and dysphagia. Nature, London: Macmillan, v. 344, n. 6268, 1990, p. 715.
GOULD, S. J.; VRBA, E. S. Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, Boulder, CO: Paleontological Society, v. 8, n. 1, 1982, p. 4-15.
HAUSER, M. D.; CHOMSKY, N.; FITCH, W. T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, Washington: Highwire Press, v. 298, p. 1569-1579, November 22, 2002.
HAYES, K. J.; NISSEN, C. H. Higher mental functions of a home-raised chimpanzee. In: SCHRIER, A. M.; STOLLNITZ, F. (eds.) Behavior of non-human primates. New York: Academic Press, 1971, p. 59-115.
HENSCH, T. Critical period regulation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, v. 27, 2004, p. 549-579.
HORNSTEIN, N.; NUNES, J.; GROHMANN, K. K. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 341 p.
KONOPKA, G.; BOMAR, J. M.; WINDEN, K.; COPPOLA, G.; JOHNSON, G. O.; GAO, F.; PENG, S.; PREUSS, T. M.; WOHLSCHLEGEL, J. A.; GESCHWIND, D. H. Human-specific transcriptional regulation of CNS development genes by FOXP2. Nature, London: Macmillan, v. 462, 2009, p. 213-217.
LAGE, A. C. Uma revisão crítica de Linguistic prominence and Broca’s area: the influence of animacy as linearization principle. Linguí∫tica, Rio de Janeiro: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 2, p. 18-23, dezembro 2011.
______. O traço de animacidade. Confluência, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Lucerna/Liceu Literário Português, v. 37, p. 215-226, 2010.
LAI, C. S. L.; FISHER S. E.; HURST, J. A.; VARGHA-KHADEM, F.; MONACO A. P. A novel forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature, London: Macmillan, v. 413, 2001, p. 519-523.
MIYAGAWA, S.; BERWICK, R. C.; OKANOYA, K. The emergence of hierarchical structure in human language. Frontiers in Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT, v. 4, n. 71, 2013, p. 1-6.
PENHUNE, V.; CISMARU, R.; DORSAINT-PIERRE, R.; PETITTO, L. A.; ZATORRE, R. The morphometry of auditory cortex in the congenitally deaf measured using MRI. NeuroImage, Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 20, 2003, p. 1215-1225.
PETITTO, L. A.; KOVELMAN, I. The bilingual paradox: How signing-speaking bilingual children help us to resolve bilingual issues and teach us about the brain’s mechanisms underlying all language acquisition. Learning Languages, Washington: Eric, v. 8, n. 3, 2003, p. 5-18
POEPPEL, D.; EMBICK, D. Defining the relation between Linguistics and Neuroscience. In: Cutler, A. (Ed.) Twenty-first century Psycholinguistics: four cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005, p.102-118.
SANTOS, T. S. Animacidade: um estudo entre línguas. 2013. 64 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
SAUSSURE, F. Curso de linguística geral. Trad. Antônio Chelini, José Paulo Paes e Izidoro Blikstein. 27. ed., São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006, 281 p.
SEIDENBERG, M. S.; PETITTO, L. A. Communication, symbolic communication, and language in child and chimpanzee: comment on Savage-Rumbaugh, McDonald, Sevcik, Hopkins, and Rupert (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Washington: American Psychological Association, v. 116, n. 3, 1987, p. 279-287.
SILVA, M. L.; VIELLIARD, J. Entropy calculations for measuring birdsong diversity: the case of the White-vented Violetear (Colibri Serrirostris). SAZU, Ljubljana, Eslovênia: Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, v. 47, 2006, p. 37-49.
SOUZA, C. C. Preposições em português: uma análise dentro da Gramática Gerativa. 2014. 169 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
TERRACE, H.; PETITTO, L. A.; SANDERS, R. J.; BEVER, T. G. Can an ape create a sentence? Science, Washington: Highwire Press, v. 206, n. 4421, 1979, p. 891-902.
TOKUDA, I.; RIEDE, T.; NEUBAUER, J.; OWREN, M. I.; HERZEL, H. Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America, v. 111, n. 6, 2002, p. 2906-2919.
VIELLIARD, J. Phylogeny of bioacoustical parameters in birds. Bioacoustics, v. 6, 1995, p. 171-175.
YANG, C. The infinite gift: how children learn and unlearn the languages of the world. 1. ed. New York: Scribner, 2006. 289 p.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes : a. Les auteurs conservent les droits d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l'œuvre étant concédée simultanément sous licence Creative Commons Attribution qui permet de partager l'œuvre avec reconnaissance de la paternité et première publication dans cette revue. b. Les auteurs sont autorisés à assumer des contrats supplémentaires séparément, pour la distribution non exclusive de la version de l'œuvre publiée dans cette revue (par exemple, publier dans un dépôt institutionnel ou sous forme de chapitre de livre), avec mention de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue. journal. c.Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à publier et distribuer leur travail en ligne (par exemple dans des référentiels institutionnels ou sur leur page personnelle) à tout moment avant ou pendant le processus éditorial, car cela peut générer des changements productifs ainsi qu'augmenter l'impact et la citation de travail publié
